Via 27BStroke6: "AT&T, one of the nation's largest ISPs and internet backbone providers, is now working with Hollywood and the recording industry to create a network-based solution to police copyright infringement, according to the Los Angeles Times."
Well, since they have the deep packet inspection technologies riding on the backbone, and since their collaboration with the NSA (and the tech used) is in the open, why not resell the service... Discounting the invasive nature of sniffing customer's (and potentially non-customer's) internet traffic, there's the issue of privacy, security, false positives, and of course, the ever-present issue that an IP address doesn't equal identity. Will they start filtering porn next? Or spam? Or offers from competing ISPs?
Once they've demonstrated the capability, will they be compelled to try to identify and block fraud, threats, or other activities? What about corporate data? What about legitimate fair use of copyright works (e.g. streaming MP3s of CDs you own from your home PC to your work PC? Or, god forbid Trent Reznor tries to upload one of his own tracks to his web site)... And will it all be moot once this hits the public eye, and session encryption tools like Tor become more mainstream? Blah.
AT&T sucks. Seriously. They should be ashamed of spying on their own customers - and AT&T customers suck too. At least the ones who continue to subscribe to AT&T services knowing the open hostility that AT&T exhibits toward its customers.Oh, and in related AT&T wholesale surveillance news, The SpyRoom docs have been released. Also from Wired: "A civil liberties group suing telecom giant AT&T for allegedly installing illegal secret surveillance rooms in its internet facilities at the behest of the National Security Agency published substantial portions of long-sealed case documents Tuesday."
Labels: ATT, domestic_spying, espionage, freedom, MPAA, NSA, privacy, RIAA, war_on_customers