Mobiles used to surveil shoppers..

Times Online: "Customers in shopping centres are having their every move tracked by a new type of surveillance that listens in on the whisperings of their mobile phones.

The technology can tell when people enter a shopping centre, what stores they visit, how long they remain there, and what route they take as they walked around.

The device cannot access personal details about a person’s identity or contacts, but privacy campaigners expressed concern about potential intrusion should the data fall into the wrong hands."


Seems like this would be easy enough to correlate with time-coded surveillance video on premises... Speaking of which, aren't they already doing this with the cameras?

FBI data mines consumer grocery records for 'signs of terrorists'

CQ Politics: "Like Hansel and Gretel hoping to follow their bread crumbs out of the forest, the FBI sifted through customer data collected by San Francisco-area grocery stores in 2005 and 2006, hoping that sales records of Middle Eastern food would lead to Iranian terrorists.

The idea was that a spike in, say, falafel sales, combined with other data, would lead to Iranian secret agents in the south San Francisco-San Jose area. The brainchild of top FBI counterterrorism officials Phil Mudd and Willie T. Hulon, according to well-informed sources, the project didn’t last long. It was torpedoed by the head of the FBI’s criminal investigations division, Michael A. Mason, who argued that putting somebody on a terrorist list for what they ate was ridiculous — and possibly illegal.

A check of federal court records in California did not reveal any prosecutions developed from falafel trails. "


As 27BStroke6 points out - "It's not clear how the FBI got the records to sift through in the first place - did grocery stores volunteer the data or get served with national security letters or the dread Section 215 of the Patriot Act."

Not going to say we told you so...

Really.

So Democrats and Republicans both hate freedom after all...

27bStroke6: "A new law expanding the government's spying powers gives the Bush Administration a six-month window to install possibly permanent back doors in the nation's communication networks. The legislation was passed hurriedly by Congress over the weekend and signed into law Sunday by President Bush."

"In short, the law gives the Administration the power to order the nation's communication service providers -- which range from Gmail, AOL IM, Twitter, Skype, traditional phone companies, ISPs, internet backbone providers, Federal Express, and social networks -- to create possibly permanent spying outposts for the federal government."


Let the Noise to Signal ratio increase in 3...2...1... now. Not even going out on a limb to say that this infrastructure will absolutely be used in routine wholesale surveillance of US citizens, our actions, our thoughts, and our interconnections.

So the meta-theme is that people want freedom, and governments want control. Looks like we're well on our way to joining the ranks of nations we would have ridiculed as being 'not free' even 20 years ago.

Question: Why do we feel like the 'war on terrr' is merely a pretext? Why do those charged with preserving individual freedom seem driven to curtail it at every available opportunity? Republican. Democrat. Doesn't seem to matter. The motivations and actions of our elected representatives appear counter to what they should be as leaders of a free society.

Unless we're over that?

Windows Vista streams personal data to Microsoft

Softpedia: "Are you using Windows Vista? Then you might as well know that the licensed operating system installed on your machine is harvesting a healthy volume of information for Microsoft. In this context, a program such as the Windows Genuine Advantage is the last of your concerns. In fact, in excess of 20 Windows Vista features and services are hard at work collecting and transmitting your personal data to the Redmond company. "

So on the plus side, Microsoft is pretty open about the fact that they're watching you - although we'd wager that most Vista users are utterly unaware that a steady stream of personal info is phoning home. Is it a spyware OS? Maybe. Maybe not. We're not using it, so we don't really care.

The real question is "who does your computer, your property, serve? You, or others?"

Now even the ads are watching us...

Wired: "The eyebox2 from xuuk is a palm-size video camera surrounded by infrared light-emitting diodes. It can record eye contact with 15-degree accuracy at a distance of up to 33 feet. A simple glance from a passerby scores an impression, providing a tally that enables new Google-like measurement metrics that real-world advertisers could only dream about until recently."


Peachy.

Google spy-vans

Roundup of the Google residential and vehicle spy-van stories... For those not yet in the loop, Google Maps has rolled out a new 'feature' where you can click on a street and get a 360 degree view of that location - including whatever happened to be there when the shots were taken.

People and their faces. Car make, model, and license plates. Through open windows... While it shows what anyone would see while sitting on the street at that moment in time, it's now available to any interwebs user, including stalkers, thieves, or profile builders. (Nice new Mercedes in this driveway, next to house address, including license plate - And hey - there's the owner's face.. Seems to have a nice plasma on the living room wall... etc.)

Here's BoingBoing's look at the spy vehicles being used to make the photos.

And 27StrokeB6's running log of interesting street level views (bikini-clad sunbathers, dude walking out of strip club, etc)...

And the appropriately named "streetviewer"

While limited to major metro areas (SF, NYC, Vegas), the goal is probably to capture everything. They do have a 'this invades my privacy' button, but we're not sure what it does. Here's a flash-back to keeping your house out of the photo database, using the DMCA and a wall sized original poem.

And we're still holding our breath hoping that Elinor Mills of CNet will follow up last year's CNet / Google spat by posting a street level view of the homes of Google's founders.

Step 1. Aquire ad companies. Step 2. Wholesale surveillance. Step 3. Profit.

Interesting duo-fecta of announcements this week from two competing retardo-level market cap companies in the computing world. Both Micro$oft and Google have acquired ad-serving companies that extend reach beyond their own properties - and curiously, both have plans to do the deep cross-property profiling of individuals and their online activities.


From the Financial Times, on Google's 'do no evil' plan: "Google’s ambition to maximise the personal information it holds on users is so great that the search engine envisages a day when it can tell people what jobs to take and how they might spend their days off. Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, said gathering more personal data was a key way for Google to expand... Fears have been stoked by the potential for Google to build up a detailed picture of someone’s behaviour by combining its records of web searches with the information from DoubleClick’s “cookies”, the software it places on users’ machines to track which sites they visit."


From New Scientist on Micro$oft's continued push to assimilation: "If you thought you could protect your privacy on the web by lying about your personal details, think again. In online communities at least, entering fake details such as a bogus name or age may no longer prevent others from working out exactly who you are. That is the spectre raised by new research conducted by Microsoft. The computing giant is developing software that could accurately guess your name, age, gender and potentially even your location, by analysing telltale patterns in your web browsing history. But experts say the idea is a clear threat to privacy - and may be illegal in some places."


Spiffy. Inescapable pervasive wholesale surveillance, by Micro$oft, Google, the federal government, and ISPs.. Let the countdown to investigative subpoenas begin? Pleh. Time to start a new internet. This one's been infected.

Total Information Awareness - more lives than a cat.

Washington Times: "Homeland Security officials are testing a supersnoop computer system that sifts through personal information on U.S. citizens to detect possible terrorist attacks, prompting concerns from lawmakers who have called for investigations.

The system uses the same data-mining process that was developed by the Pentagon's Total Information Awareness (TIA) project that was banned by Congress in 2003 because of vast privacy violations. "

" The ADVISE and TIA data-mining projects rely on personal data to track individual behavior and consumer transactions to develop computer algorithms that create a pattern that some behavioral scientists say can predict terrorist behavior. Data can include credit-card purchases, telephone or Internet details, medical records, travel and banking information"


Notice a pattern here? Aside from the academic and civil rights arguments against pervasive monitoring of pretty much everything, and aside from the 'bad science' behind this approach as a preventative security apparatus, we're seeing a pattern of disregard.. Executive branch starts it up, Legislative shuts it down. Executive branch moves it to another agency, gives it a new name. Legislative shuts it down. Ad infinitum.

It's a bad idea, open to massive abuse, inaccuracy, and is unlikely to be effective at much more than wasting time and money - at least in the 'war on terrrr'.. Human intelligence and traditional law enforcement is a better bet here.

The information that one is missing a kidney, makes occasional trips to Cleveland, and prefers Colgate toothpaste in no way susses out criminal or terrorist intent. It's all noise, no signal. But it's a great tool for traditional crimes, drug crimes, etc - that happens to bypass due process protections and thresholds for probable cause. (you know, one or two foundational Constitutional amendments...)

It's also a great way to keep tabs on affiliations, dissidents and those who disagree with the those in power. Opinion crimes.

It's just a question of 'what kind of society do we want'... What freedoms do we value? And even if we trust the party in power not to abuse the systems, what about your least favorite party? Going through mail, monitoring phone calls, tracking behaviors. Not to mention insiders... individuals with searchable access to every fact on everyone. Bah.